The question of whether presidents should be granted immunity from legal action is a complex one. Advocates for immunity argue that it is essential to allow presidents to fully perform their duties without the constant threat of legal challenges. They contend that immunity safeguards against unfounded claims and prevents distractions on governing.

The concept of immunity has always been complex. A robust physiological shield is often seen as a sign of strength and health. But could immunity be more than just a biological safeguard? Could it, in fact, become a instrument to manipulate power dynamics immunity clause within societies? The potential for immunity-based advantage is a grave is